On 02/26/22 03:27, Joel Jacobson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2022, at 22:12, Chapman Flack wrote: >> I would be happy to review this patch, but a look through the email leaves me >> thinking it may still be waiting on a C implementation of pg_get_acl(). Is >> that >> right? > > Not sure.
It looked to me as if the -hackers messages of 25 and 26 March 2021 had found a consensus that a pg_get_acl() function would be a good thing, with the views to be implemented over that. I'm just not seeing any later patch that adds such a function. Regards, -Chap
