On 3/16/22 16:53, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Personally I don't have problem with the use of SETTING. I think the >> meaning is pretty plain in context and unlikely to produce any confusion. > I'm just unhappy about the disconnect with the documentation. I wonder > if we could get away with s/configuration parameter/setting/g in the docs. > > I don't think we need to fix that here though. If you can live with SETTING for now I will undertake to fix the docs post-feature-freeze if necessary. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
