On 3/21/22 14:05, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 20.03.22 23:55, Tomas Vondra wrote: >> Attached is a rebased patch, addressing most of the remaining issues. > > This looks okay to me, if the two FIXMEs are addressed. Remember to > also update protocol.sgml if you change LOGICAL_REP_MSG_SEQUENCE.
Thanks. Do we want to use a different constant for the sequence message? I've used 'X' for the WIP patch, but maybe there's a better value? regards -- Tomas Vondra EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
