Hi, On 2021-11-22 18:56:43 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > There was an earlier comment by Andres that asyncXactLSN should also be > atomic, to avoid an ugly spinlock interaction with the new atomic-based > logwrtResult. The 0002 here is an attempt at doing that; I found that > it also needed to change WalWriterSleeping to use atomics, to avoid > XLogSetAsyncXactLSN having to grab the spinlock for that.
This patch currently doesn't apply: http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_37_2716.log Are you aiming this for v15? Otherwise I'd like to move the entry to the next CF. Marked as waiting-on-author. Greetings, Andres Freund
