On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 19:34 Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote:
> > On 3/15/22 09:51, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On 21.02.22 13:09, Euler Taveira wrote: > >> A new tool called pg_subscriber does this conversion and is tightly > >> integrated > >> with Postgres. > > > > Are we comfortable with the name pg_subscriber? It seems too general. > > Are we planning other subscriber-related operations in the future? If > > so, we should at least make this one use a --create option or > > something like that. > > > Not really sold on the name (and I didn't much like the name > pglogical_create_subscriber either, although it's a cool facility and > I'm happy to see us adopting something like it). > > ISTM we should have a name that conveys that we are *converting* a > replica or equivalent to a subscriber. > > Some time ago I did a POC on it [1] and I used the name pg_create_subscriber [1] https://github.com/fabriziomello/pg_create_subscriber -- Fabrízio de Royes Mello
