Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> And ... right after hitting send, I see that the recovery check
> failures are under separate troubleshooting and thus probably
> unrelated.
Yeah, we've been chasing those for months.
> But that leaves me even more confused. How can a change to
> only the server code cause a client utility to fail to detect
> corruption that is being created by Perl while the server is stopped?
Hmm, I'd supposed that the failing test cases were new as of 412ad7a55.
Now I see they're not, which indeed puts quite a different spin on
things. Your thought about maybe the server isn't shut down yet is
interesting --- did 412ad7a55 touch anything about the shutdown
sequence?
regards, tom lane
