On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 09:25:44AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I've always felt that the pg_foo_fn.h business was a kluge, and would >> be happy to get rid of it. But one could also argue that it would be >> a good design, if we adopted it uniformly instead of haphazardly. >> But that'd require more code churn, and there's no longer a lot to be >> gained thereby. > > I vote for removing pg_foo_fn.h.
+1 on that. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
