On Sun, 27 Mar 2022 15:28:41 +0900 (JST) Tatsuo Ishii <is...@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
> > This patch has caused the PDF documentation to fail to build cleanly: > > > > [WARN] FOUserAgent - The contents of fo:block line 1 exceed the available > > area in the inline-progression direction by more than 50 points. (See > > position 125066:375) > > > > It's complaining about this: > > > > <synopsis> > > <replaceable>interval_start</replaceable> > > <replaceable>num_transactions</replaceable> > > <replaceable>sum_latency</replaceable> > > <replaceable>sum_latency_2</replaceable> > > <replaceable>min_latency</replaceable> > > <replaceable>max_latency</replaceable> { > > <replaceable>failures</replaceable> | > > <replaceable>serialization_failures</replaceable> > > <replaceable>deadlock_failures</replaceable> } <optional> > > <replaceable>sum_lag</replaceable> <replaceable>sum_lag_2</replaceable> > > <replaceable>min_lag</replaceable> <replaceable>max_lag</replaceable> > > <optional> <replaceable>skipped</replaceable> </optional> </optional> > > <optional> <replaceable>retried</replaceable> > > <replaceable>retries</replaceable> </optional> > > </synopsis> > > > > which runs much too wide in HTML format too, even though that toolchain > > doesn't tell you so. > > Yeah. > > > We could silence the warning by inserting an arbitrary line break or two, > > or refactoring the syntax description into multiple parts. Either way > > seems to create a risk of confusion. > > I think we can fold the line nicely. Here is the rendered image. > > Before: > interval_start num_transactions sum_latency sum_latency_2 min_latency > max_latency { failures | serialization_failures deadlock_failures } [ sum_lag > sum_lag_2 min_lag max_lag [ skipped ] ] [ retried retries ] > > After: > interval_start num_transactions sum_latency sum_latency_2 min_latency > max_latency > { failures | serialization_failures deadlock_failures } [ sum_lag sum_lag_2 > min_lag max_lag [ skipped ] ] [ retried retries ] > > Note that before it was like this: > > interval_start num_transactions sum_latency sum_latency_2 min_latency > max_latency [ sum_lag sum_lag_2 min_lag max_lag [ skipped ] ] > > So newly added items are "{ failures | serialization_failures > deadlock_failures }" and " [ retried retries ]". > > > TBH, I think the *real* problem is that the complexity of this log format > > has blown past "out of hand". Can't we simplify it? Who is really going > > to use all these numbers? I pity the poor sucker who tries to write a > > log analysis tool that will handle all the variants. > > Well, the extra logging items above only appear when the retry feature > is enabled. For those who do not use the feature the only new logging > item is "failures". For those who use the feature, the extra logging > items are apparently necessary. For example if we write an application > using repeatable read or serializable transaction isolation mode, > retrying failed transactions due to srialization error is an essential > technique. Also the retry rate of transactions will deeply affect the > performance and in such use cases the newly added items will be > precisou information. I would suggest leave the log items as it is. > > Patch attached. Even applying this patch, "make postgres-A4.pdf" arises the warning on my machine. After some investigations, I found that previous document had a break after 'num_transactions', but it has been removed due to this commit. So, I would like to get back this as it was. I attached the patch. Regards, Yugo Nagata -- Yugo NAGATA <nag...@sraoss.co.jp>
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/pgbench.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/pgbench.sgml index ebdb4b3f46..4437d5ef53 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/pgbench.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/pgbench.sgml @@ -2401,7 +2401,7 @@ END; format is used for the log files: <synopsis> -<replaceable>interval_start</replaceable> <replaceable>num_transactions</replaceable> <replaceable>sum_latency</replaceable> <replaceable>sum_latency_2</replaceable> <replaceable>min_latency</replaceable> <replaceable>max_latency</replaceable> { <replaceable>failures</replaceable> | <replaceable>serialization_failures</replaceable> <replaceable>deadlock_failures</replaceable> } <optional> <replaceable>sum_lag</replaceable> <replaceable>sum_lag_2</replaceable> <replaceable>min_lag</replaceable> <replaceable>max_lag</replaceable> <optional> <replaceable>skipped</replaceable> </optional> </optional> <optional> <replaceable>retried</replaceable> <replaceable>retries</replaceable> </optional> +<replaceable>interval_start</replaceable> <replaceable>num_transactions</replaceable>&zwsp <replaceable>sum_latency</replaceable> <replaceable>sum_latency_2</replaceable> <replaceable>min_latency</replaceable> <replaceable>max_latency</replaceable> { <replaceable>failures</replaceable> | <replaceable>serialization_failures</replaceable> <replaceable>deadlock_failures</replaceable> } <optional> <replaceable>sum_lag</replaceable> <replaceable>sum_lag_2</replaceable> <replaceable>min_lag</replaceable> <replaceable>max_lag</replaceable> <optional> <replaceable>skipped</replaceable> </optional> </optional> <optional> <replaceable>retried</replaceable> <replaceable>retries</replaceable> </optional> </synopsis> where