On 3/28/22 15:59, Andres Freund wrote: > > One thing I'd like to discuss fairly soon is what kind of approach to take for > integrating meson support. Most other projects I looked kept parallel > buildsystems for at least a release, so that there's one round of "broad" user > feedback.
We did something similar when we moved from CVS to git. > > In our context it could make sense to merge meson, after a few months of > shakeup remove the current windows buildsystems, and then in release + 1 > remove the make based stuff. > > But we can have that discussion that before the next CF, but still after > code-freeze & immediate mopup. > I'd like to get a stake in the ground and then start working on buildfarm support. Up to now I think it's been a bit too much of a moving target. Essentially that would mean an interim option for building with meson. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
