On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 4:33 PM James Coleman <jtc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hmm, having it match the way it works makes sense. Would you feel > comfortable with an intermediate step (queueing up that as a larger > change) changing the clause to something like "indexes will still have > to be rebuilt unless the system can guarantee that the sort order is > proven to be unchanged" (with appropriate wordsmithing to be a bit > less verbose if possible)?
Yeah, that seems fine. It's arguable how much detail we should go into here - but a statement of the form you propose is not misleading, and that's what seems most important to me. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
