Tom Lane writes:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
>> Andreas Seltenreich wrote:
>>> as of 039eb6e92f:
>>> TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(subpath->parallel_safe)", File: "pathnode.c",
>>> Line: 1813)
>
>> Uh, that's pretty strange -- that patch did not touch the planner at
>> all, and the relcache.c changes are pretty trivial.
>
> I don't think Andreas meant that the bug is necessarily new in 039eb6e92f,
> only that that's the version he happened to be testing.
Right. I'm not testing often enough yet to be able to report on commit
granularity :-). I'll try for a less ambiguos wording in future
reports.
