> On Apr 4, 2022, at 10:41 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> 
> Is our CI setup failing to capture stderr from TAP tests??

I'm looking into the way our TAP test infrastructure assigns port numbers to 
nodes, and whether that is reasonable during parallel test runs with nodes 
stopping and starting again.  On casual inspection, that doesn't seem ok, 
because the Cluster.pm logic to make sure nodes get unique ports doesn't seem 
to be thinking about other parallel tests running.  It will notice if another 
node is already bound to the port, but if another node has been killed and not 
yet restarted, won't things go off the rails?

I'm writing a parallel test just for this.  Will get back to you.

—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company





Reply via email to