čt 7. 4. 2022 v 19:04 odesílatel David G. Johnston < david.g.johns...@gmail.com> napsal:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 9:58 AM Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> wrote: > >> On 4/7/22 12:37, Tom Lane wrote: >> > Mark Dilger <mark.dil...@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> >>> On Apr 7, 2022, at 9:29 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> >>> I wouldn't >> >>> fight too hard if people want to lengthen it to \dconfig for >> consistency >> >>> with set_config(). >> > >> >> I'd prefer \dconfig, but if the majority on this list view that as >> pedantically forcing them to type more, I'm not going to kick up a fuss >> about \dconf. >> > >> > Maybe I'm atypical, but I'm probably going to use tab completion >> > either way, so it's not really more keystrokes. The consistency >> > point is a good one that I'd not considered before. >> >> Yeah I had thought about \dconfig too -- +1 to that, although I am fine >> with \dconf too. >> >> > \dconfig[+] gets my vote. I was going to say "conf" just isn't common > jargon to say or write; but the one place it is - file extensions - is > relevant and common. But still, I would go with the non-jargon form. > dconfig is better, because google can be confused - dconf is known project https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dconf The length is not too important when we have tab complete Regards Pavel > David J. >
