On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 5:33 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Justin Pryzby <pry...@telsasoft.com> writes: > > You have to either include the pre-requisite patches as 0001, and your > > patch as > > 0002 (as I'm doing now), or name your patch something other than *.diff or > > *.patch, so cfbot doesn't think it's a new version of the patch to be > > tested. > > This patch has been basically ignored for a full two years now. > (Remarkably, it's still passing in the cfbot.) > > I have to think that that means there's just not enough interest > to justify committing it. Should we mark it rejected and move on? > If not, what needs to happen to get it unstuck?
I can help with review and/or other work here. Please give me a couple of weeks. .m
