On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 06:29:53PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Chapman Flack <c...@anastigmatix.net> writes: > > v4 looks good to me. > > Pushed with very minor editorialization. Mainly, I undid the > decision to stop printing the function source text, on the > grounds that (1) it falsified the comment immediately above, > and (2) if you have to print it anyway to avoid compiler warnings, > you're just creating confusing inconsistency between the two > handler functions.
Sounds good to me, thanks! Regards, Mark
