Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On 08.04.22 22:26, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I think we should put a centralized level check
>>> into logging.c, and get rid of at least the "if (likely())"
>>> checks, because those are going to succeed approximately 100.0%
>>> of the time. Maybe there's an argument for keeping the unlikely()
>>> ones.
> Yeah, that seems ok to change. The previous coding style is more useful
> if you have a lot of debug messages in a hot code path, but that usually
> doesn't apply to where this is used.
The patch I presented keeps the unlikely() checks in the debug-level
macros. Do you think we should drop those too? I figured that avoiding
evaluating the arguments would be worth something.
regards, tom lane
