Justin Pryzby <pry...@telsasoft.com> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 11:54:11AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> I will deal with the structural issues soon.
> I didn't actually intend this as a complaint. The ability for a reference to
> be specific and granular is good. So there may be reasons to change the
> structure, but my comment is only about a +0.1.
I was going to complain about it on the grounds that it looks
approximately nothing like other sections of func.sgml. The layout
of the rest of that file is hard-won presentation knowledge and
should not be lightly ignored.
regards, tom lane
