On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 12:09 PM wangw.f...@fujitsu.com <wangw.f...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > So I skip tracking lag during a transaction just like the current HEAD. > Attach the new patch. >
Thanks, please find the updated patch where I have slightly modified the comments. Sawada-San, Euler, do you have any opinion on this approach? I personally still prefer the approach implemented in v10 [1] especially due to the latest finding by Wang-San that we can't update the lag-tracker apart from when it is invoked at the transaction end. However, I am fine if we like this approach more. [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/OS3PR01MB6275E0C2B4D9E488AD7CBA209E1F9%40OS3PR01MB6275.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
v15-0001-Fix-the-logical-replication-timeout-during-large.patch
Description: Binary data
