Simon Riggs <[email protected]> writes: > Minor doc patch to replace with latest RFC number
Hmm, I'm a bit disinclined to claim compliance with a new RFC
sight unseen. What were the changes?
regards, tom lane
Simon Riggs <[email protected]> writes: > Minor doc patch to replace with latest RFC number
Hmm, I'm a bit disinclined to claim compliance with a new RFC
sight unseen. What were the changes?
regards, tom lane