> On 14 Apr 2022, at 09:42, Shinya Kato <shinya11.k...@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
> To add the ROLE clause, the originally existing --role option (corresponding
> to the IN ROLE clause) is changed to the --in-role option. Would this not be
> good from a backward compatibility standpoint?
- printf(_(" -g, --role=ROLE new role will be a member of this
role\n"));
+ printf(_(" -g, --in-role=ROLE new role will be a member of this
role\n"));
+ printf(_(" -G, --role=ROLE this role will be a member of new
role\n"));
Won't this make existing scripts to behave differently after an upgrade? That
seems like something we should avoid at all costs.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
