>>>>> "Chapman" == Chapman Flack <c...@anastigmatix.net> writes:

 Chapman> AFAICS, that is *all* that comment block has to say about why
 Chapman> there's an active snapshot stack. I believe you are saying it
 Chapman> has another important function, namely that its top element is
 Chapman> what tells the executor what can be seen.

That's not precisely true - ultimately, the routines that do actual
scans take the snapshot to use as a parameter, and the executor mostly
references the snapshot from the EState; but a bunch of places do
require that ActiveSnapshot be set to the currently applicable snapshot
(e.g. for queries inside stable functions nested inside the main query).

Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

Reply via email to