On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 8:39 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> writes: > > Is there a thread I'm not finding where the upcoming JSON function > > documentation is being made reasonably usable after doubling its size > with > > all the new JSON Table features that we've added? If nothing else, the > > table of contents at the top of the page needs to be greatly expanded to > > make seeing and navigating to all that is available a possibility. > > The entire structure of that text needs to be rethought, IMO, as it > has been written with precisely no concern for fitting into our > hard-won structure for func.sgml. Andrew muttered something about > rewriting it awhile ago, but I don't know what progress he's made. > > I suppose regardless of the answer, or which thread is used for the patch, the question at hand is whether this is problematic enough to warrant an open item. I would lean toward yes, we can decide how much reworking is considered sufficient to clear the open item separately.
David J.
