Corey Huinker <corey.huin...@gmail.com> writes:
> The infinite-upper-bound-withlimit-pushdown counterexample makes sense, but
> seems like we're using generate_series() only because we lack a function
> that generates a series of N elements, without a specified upper bound,
> something like
> generate_finite_series( start, step, num_elements )
Yeah, that could be a reasonable thing to add.
> And if we did that, I'd lobby that we have one that takes dates as well as
> one that takes timestamps, because that was my reason for starting the
> thread above.
Less sure about that. ISTM the reason that the previous proposal failed
was that it introduced too much ambiguity about how to resolve
unknown-type arguments. Wouldn't the same problems arise here?
regards, tom lane
