Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2022-05-24 12:01:58 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> For back-patching into v14, we could put the new NodeTag type at the >> end of that enum list. The change in the inline GetMemoryChunkContext >> is probably an acceptable hazard.
> Why would we backpatch this to 14? I don't think we have any regressions
> there?
Oh, sorry, I meant v15. I'm operating on the assumption that we have
at least a weak ABI freeze in v15 already.
regards, tom lane
