Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 11:40 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Looks reasonable to me, but I'm hardly a Perl monk. Anybody have >> a different opinion?
> Well, it falsifies the immediately preceding comment, but I think it's
> fine otherwise.
Duh, right, will fix.
This seems appropriate to back-patch as far as 9.2, since AFAIK there's
not currently anything that breaks plperl in the out-of-support branches.
regards, tom lane
