On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 12:03 AM Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 10:27:27AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: ...
> My big point is that you should not be showing up with a patch but > rather have these discussions to get agreement that this is the > direction the community wants to go. The purpose of posting the POC patch was certainly not to present a fait accompli design/implementation. We wanted to solicit some community feedback about the desirability of the feature, but because LRG is complicated to describe we felt that having a basic functional POC might help to better understand the proposal. Also, we thought the ability to experiment with the proposed API could help people to decide whether LRG is something worth pursuing or not. ------ Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
