On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 3:15 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Maybe. What I was pointing out is that this is SQL-standard syntax > and there are SQL-standard semantics that it ought to be implementing. > Probably those semantics match what you describe here, but we ought > to dive into the spec and make sure before we spend a lot of effort. > It's not quite clear to me whether the spec defines any particular > unique key (identity) for the set of role authorizations.
I sort of thought http://postgr.es/m/3981966.1646429...@sss.pgh.pa.us constituted a completed investigation of this sort. No? -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
