Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> ParallelPortInfo sounds kind of right for the job to me in this set of
> proposals, as the data is from the Port, and that's some information
> shared between all the parallel workers and the leader.
I agree with Robert's complaint that Parallel is far too generic
a term here. Also, the fact that this data is currently in struct
Port seems like an artifact.
Don't we have a term for the set of processes comprising a leader
plus parallel workers? If we called that set FooGroup, then
something like FooGroupSharedInfo would be on-point.
regards, tom lane
