Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 3:58 AM Rod Taylor <r...@rbt.ca> wrote:
>> Is this more involved than creating a list of all valid Unicode characters
>> (~144 thousand), sorting them, then running crc32 over the sorted order to
>> create the "version" for the library/collation pair? Far from free but few
>> databases use more than a couple different collations.
> Collation rules have multiple levels and all kinds of quirks, so that
> won't work.
Yeah, and it's exactly at the level of quirks that things are likely
to change. Nobody's going to suddenly start sorting B before A.
They might, say, change their minds about where the digram "cz"
sorts relative to single letters, in languages where special rules
for that are a thing.
The idea of fingerprinting a collation's behavior is interesting,
but I've got doubts about whether we can make a sufficiently thorough
fingerprint.
regards, tom lane
