Hi, On 2022-06-15 19:07:50 -0700, Mark Dilger wrote: > > On Jun 15, 2022, at 6:55 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > > > I think nothing would happen in this case - only pre-clustered tables get > > clustered in an argumentless CLUSTER. What am I missing? > > The "VACUUM FULL" synonym of "CLUSTER" doesn't depend on whether the target > is pre-clustered
VACUUM FULL isn't a synonym of CLUSTER. While a good bit of the implementation is shared, VACUUM FULL doesn't order the table contents. I see now reason why an AM shouldn't support VACUUM FULL? > , and both will run against the table if the user has run an ALTER > TABLE..CLUSTER ON. If a user does that for a table that doesn't support clustering, well, I don't see what's gained by not erroring out. Greetings, Andres Freund
