On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 at 15:33, Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote: > Have you tried this with the insert benchmark [1]?
I was mostly focusing on the performance of the hashed saop feature after having removed the additional fields that pushed ExprEvalStep over 64 bytes in 14. I agree it would be good to do further benchmarking to see if there's anything else that's snuck into 15 that's slowed that benchmark down, but we can likely work on that after we get the ExprEvalStep size back to 64 bytes again. David
