Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > On 17.06.22 07:11, Tom Lane wrote: >> Notably, I think the choice >> that pfree(NULL) is disallowed traces directly to worries about >> coding-pattern-compatibility with pre-POSIX free(). Should we >> revisit that?
> Yes please, and also repalloc().
repalloc no, because you wouldn't know which context to do the
allocation in.
regards, tom lane
