On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 1:33 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 11:22 AM shiy.f...@fujitsu.com
> <shiy.f...@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri Jun 17, 2022 11:06 AM shiy.f...@fujitsu.com <shiy.f...@fujitsu.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Attached the new version of patch set. I also moved the partitioned table
> > > check
> > > in logicalrep_rel_mark_updatable() to check_relation_updatable() as
> > > discussed
> > > [2].
> > >
> >
> > Attached back-branch patches of the first patch.
> >
> 
> One minor comment:
> + /*
> + * If it is a partitioned table, we don't check it, we will check its
> + * partition later.
> + */
> 
> Can we change the above comment to: "For partitioned tables, we only
> need to care if the target partition is updatable (aka has PK or RI
> defined for it)."?
> 

Thanks for your comment. Modified in the attached patches. 

Regards,
Shi yu

Attachment: v11-0001-Fix-partition-table-s-RI-checking-on-the-subscri.patch
Description: v11-0001-Fix-partition-table-s-RI-checking-on-the-subscri.patch

Attachment: v11-pg13-0001-Fix-partition-table-s-RI-checking-on-the-subsc_patch
Description: v11-pg13-0001-Fix-partition-table-s-RI-checking-on-the-subsc_patch

Attachment: v11-pg14-0001-Fix-partition-table-s-RI-checking-on-the-subsc_patch
Description: v11-pg14-0001-Fix-partition-table-s-RI-checking-on-the-subsc_patch

Reply via email to