On Wed, 15 Jun 2022 at 11:54, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Yeah, that is sort of the inverse problem. I think those are there > to ensure that the text appears on a fresh line even if the current > line has transient status on it. We could get rid of those perhaps > if we teach pg_log_v to remember whether it ended the last output > with a newline or not, and then put out a leading newline only if > necessary, rather than hard-wiring one into the message texts.
Is the problem that pg_upgrade doesn't know what the utilities it's calling are outputting to the same terminal? Another thing I wonder is if during development and testing there might have been more output from utilities or even the backend going on that are not happening now. -- greg