Hi David, > It's basically a glorified cross-reference. I didn't dislike directing the > reader to the internals section enough to try and establish a better location > for the main content.
One problem I see is that: + [..], but as there is no pre-existing data, visibility checks are unnecessary. ... allows a wide variety of interpretations, most of which will be wrong. And all in all I find an added paragraph somewhat cryptic. If the goal is to add a cross-reference I suggest keeping it short, something like "For additional details on various corner cases please see ...". -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
