On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 2:31 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> On 4/11/18 10:53, Tom Lane wrote: >>> It's not that much work to move the items rather than remove them, > >> Well, toward the end of the cycle, when the list of closed items is >> quite long, then it does become a bit of a burden to carefully cut and >> paste the item in the little browser window without making hash of the >> wiki page. > >> It's not a very large deal, but I doubt the result is very useful. The >> current "resolved before 11beta1" section is pretty much useless. > > Hm. There's definitely an argument to be made that it's not worth > tracking resolved items till after beta1. Once betas exist, the list > becomes useful to beta testers who may not be tracking events as closely > as hackers do. >
+1 -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company
