On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 04:59:10PM +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: > At Thu, 12 Apr 2018 14:07:53 +0900, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> > wrote in <20180412050753.ga19...@paquier.xyz> >> I have been able to spend a couple of hours on your patch, wrapping my >> mind on your stuff. So what I had in mind was something like this type >> of scenario: > > Thank for the precise explanation.
Just to be clear and to avoid incorrect conclusion. This is the type of scenarios I imagined about when I read your previous email, concluding such scenarios those cannot apply per the strong assumption on SharedRecoveryInProgress your patch heavily relies on. In short I have no objections. >> (The latest patch is a mix of two patches.) > > Sorry I counld get this. The patch called v2-0001-Change-FPW-handling.patch posted on https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180412.103430.133595350.horiguchi.kyotaro%40lab.ntt.co.jp, which is the latest version available, is a mix of the patch you are creating for this thread and of a patch aimed a fixing an issue with partition range handling. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
