Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 1:40 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> It doesn't seem like a great place for a hook, because the list of stuff
>> you could safely do there would be mighty short, possibly the empty set.
> I agree with this. But, all of the areas that v2-0003 touched for
> connectivity failures, they typically are emitting
> ereport(FATAL,/ereport(COMMERROR, (in ProcessStartupPacket) and we
> have emit_log_hook already being exposed and the implementers can,
> literally, do anything the hook.
This is utterly off-point, because those calls are not inside
signal handlers.
regards, tom lane
