On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 10:53 PM Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> wrote: > > - -> Parallel Seq Scan on tenk1 (actual rows=1960 > loops=50) > > + -> Parallel Seq Scan on tenk1 (actual rows=1960.00 > > At the not inconsiderable risk of bike-shedding.... > > I'm wondering if printing something like 0.00 will be somewhat > deceptive when the real value is non-zero but less than 1 row per 200 > loops. I wonder if the number of decimal places should be calculated > to produce a minimum of one non-zero digit for non-zero values. > > -- > greg >
+ -> Parallel Seq Scan on tenk1 (actual rows=1960.00 I have added a new check to remove any ".00" from the output because in the case of parallel queries we are getting that. Secondly, it is disturbing many test case outputs. -- Ibrar Ahmed
