On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 at 21:46, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > I wonder how much dead code for ancient operating systems we could now > drop.
> 0002-Remove-dead-getrusage-replacement-code.patch I thought the getrusage replacement code was for Windows. Does getrusage on Windows actually do anything useful? More generally I think there is a question about whether some of these things are "supported" in only a minimal way to satisfy standards but maybe not in a way that we actually want to use. Getrusage might exist on Windows but not actually report the metrics we need, reentrant library functions may be implemented by simply locking instead of actually avoiding static storage, etc. -- greg
