At Thu, 14 Jul 2022 09:40:25 +0700, John Naylor <john.nay...@enterprisedb.com> wrote in > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 4:13 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > At Wed, 13 Jul 2022 18:09:43 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi < > horikyota....@gmail.com> wrote in > > > So, "e.g." (for example) in the message sounds like "that is", which I > > > think is "i.e.". It should be fixed if this is correct. I'm not sure > > > whether to keep using Latin-origin acronyms like this, but in the > > > attached I used "i.e.". > > I did my own quick scan and found one use of i.e. that doesn't really fit, > in a sentence that has other grammatical issues: > > - Due to the differences how ECPG works compared to Informix's > ESQL/C (i.e., which steps > + Due to differences in how ECPG works compared to Informix's ESQL/C > (namely, which steps > are purely grammar transformations and which steps rely on the
Oh! > I've pushed that in addition to your changes, thanks! Thanks! regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
