Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 9:34 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> (Someday we oughta go ahead and make our Windows signal API look more >> like POSIX, as I suggested back in 2015. I'm still not taking >> point on that, though.)
> For the sigprocmask() part, here's a patch that passes CI. Only the
> SIG_SETMASK case is actually exercised by our current code, though.
Passes an eyeball check, but I can't actually test it.
regards, tom lane
