Thomas Munro <[email protected]> writes: > Seems OK for a worst case. It must still be a lot faster than doing > it in SQL. Now I wonder what the exact requirements would be to > dispatch to a faster version that would handle int4.
I find it impossible to believe that it's worth micro-optimizing
shuffle() to that extent. Now, maybe doing something in that line
in deconstruct_array and construct_array would be worth our time,
as that'd benefit a pretty wide group of functions.
regards, tom lane
