Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> writes: > On 2022-Jul-18, Richard Guo wrote: >> BTW, not related to this patch, the new lines for parallel_aware check >> in setrefs.c are very wide. How about wrap them to keep consistent with >> arounding codes?
> Not untrue! Something like this, you mean? Fixed the nearby typo while
> at it.
WFM. (I'd fixed the comment typo in my patch, but I don't mind if
you get there first.)
regards, tom lane
