At Fri, 22 Jul 2022 11:11:23 +0530, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote in > Hmm, I think that sounds more complicated than what I expected. I > suggest let's go with a simple idea of using a boolean not_ready which > will decide whether to use the additional key to search. I feel we can > extend it by using a bitmask or enum when we have a clear need for > more states.
FWIW, I vote for (only_)not_ready after rading through the thread.. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
