On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 at 10:31, Martin Kalcher <martin.kalc...@aboutsource.net> wrote: > > i came to the same conclusions and went with Option 1 (see patch). > Mainly because most code in utils/adt is organized by type and this way > it is clear, that this is a thin wrapper around pg_prng. > > What do you think?
Looks fairly neat, on a quick read-through. There's certainly something to be said for preserving the organisation by type. Regards, Dean
