On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 11:43 AM Jonathan S. Katz <jk...@postgresql.org> wrote: > ... > That said, this introduces a new restriction for this particular > scenario that doesn't exist on other scenarios. Instead, I would > advocate we document how to correctly set up the two-way replication > scenario (which we have a draft!), document the warnings around the > conflicts, perhaps include Vignesh's instructions on how to remediate a > conflict on initial sync, and consider throwing a WARNING as you suggested. > > Thoughts?
Perhaps a WARNING can be useful if the SUBSCRIPTION was created with enabled=false because then the user still has a chance to reconsider, but otherwise, I don't see what good a warning does if the potentially harmful initial copy is going to proceed anyway; isn't that like putting a warning sign at the bottom of a cliff? ------ Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia