On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 3:27 PM shiy.f...@fujitsu.com <shiy.f...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 1:22 PM vignesh C <vignes...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks for the comments, the attached v41 patch has the changes for the > > same. > > > > Thanks for updating the patch. > > I wonder in the case that the publisher uses PG15 (or before), subscriber uses > PG16, should we have this check (check if publication tables were also > subscribing from other publishers)? In this case, even if origin=none is > specified, it doesn't work because the publisher doesn't filter the origin. So > maybe we don't need the check for initial sync. Thoughts? >
IIUC for the scenario you've described (subscription origin=none and publisher < PG16) the subscriber can end up getting extra data they did not want, right? So instead of just "don't need the check", maybe this combination should throw ERROR, or at least a log a WARNING? ------ KInd Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
