On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 8:48 AM John Naylor <john.nay...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 8:55 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > > John Naylor <john.nay...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > > > This is really a straw-man proposal, since I'm not volunteering to do > > > the work, or suggest anybody else should do the same. That being the > > > case, it seems we should just go ahead with Justin's patch for > > > consistency. Possibly we could also change the messages to say "ID"? > > > > I'd be content if we change the user-facing messages (and documentation > > if any) to say "ID" not "OID". > > The documentation has both, so it makes sense to standardize on "ID". > The messages all had oid/OID, which I changed in the attached. I think > I got all the places. > > I'm thinking it's not wrong enough to confuse people, but consistency > is good, so backpatch to v15 and no further. Does anyone want to make > a case otherwise?
This is done. -- John Naylor EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
