On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 12:04:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > From my POV the only real discussion is whether we'd want to revert this in > > 15 > > and HEAD or just 15. There's imo a decent point to be made to just revert in > > 15 and aggressively press forward with the changes posted in this thread. > > I'm not for that. Code that we don't think is ready to ship > has no business being in the common tree, nor does it make > review any easier to be looking at one bulky set of > already-committed patches and another bulky set of deltas.
Agreed on removing from PG 15 and master --- it would be confusing to have lots of incomplete code in master that is not in PG 15. > I'm okay with making an exception for the include/nodes/ and > backend/nodes/ files in HEAD, since the recent changes in that > area mean it'd be a lot of error-prone work to produce a reverting > patch there. We can leave those in as dead code temporarily, I think. I don't have an opinion on this. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson
